On 2/12/2013 7:22 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Yes, I agree, it looks very good. But remember that it's only a 28mm
> equivalent for angle of coverage. I would prefer something longer for a
> people portrait but would consider using a 28mm lens on full frame. But
> never a 24mm lens or shorter where the distortion tends to become very
> evident.
On 2/12/2013 11:18 PM, SwissPace wrote:
> No Chuck, this is the new 14mm it is a 21mm equivalent.
Little or no barrel or pincushion, but the folks on the edges have slightly
fatter head and bodies than if they were in
the middle. Unavoidable with a rectilinear super wide.
Fat Head Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|