No Chuck, this is the new 14mm it is a 21mm equivalent.
On 13/02/2013 04:22, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Yes, I agree, it looks very good. But remember that it's only a 28mm
> equivalent for angle of coverage. I would prefer something longer for a
> people portrait but would consider using a 28mm lens on full frame. But
> never a 24mm lens or shorter where the distortion tends to become very
> evident.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|