Subject: | Re: [OM] (OM) Six more images on Zone-10 |
---|---|
From: | Jez Cunningham <jez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:35:56 +0100 |
Fair do's. On 23/01/2013, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Ooh, Andrew will complain at the erosion of the meaning of 'qualified'... > > No problem whatsoever. Just look at definition #2 fro the Oxford > Dictionary: > > Definition of qualified > adjective > > 1 officially recognized as being trained to perform a particular job; > certified: > newly qualified nurses > [with infinitive] competent or knowledgeable to do something; capable: > I was less well qualified than almost anyone present to recollect the olden > days > > 2 not complete or absolute; limited: > I could only judge this CD a qualified success > > > AG (leaving the English language intact for another day) Schnozz > > -- > Ken Norton > ken@xxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.zone-10.com > -- > _________________________________________________________________ > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ > > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Cracking photos, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Remote Shutter Releases, NSURIT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OM) Six more images on Zone-10, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OM) Six more images on Zone-10, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |