Subject: | Re: [OM] Remote Shutter Releases |
---|---|
From: | "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 23 Jan 2013 00:01:34 -0000 |
But what the remaining 35%? Piers -----Original Message----- From: Moose [mailto:olymoose@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: 22 January 2013 22:57 To: Olympus Camera Discussion Subject: Re: [OM] Remote Shutter Releases On 1/22/2013 2:37 PM, Ken Norton wrote: >> 90% of Chinese stuff is OK and works, although often crude. >> I invented the 90% figure - it's less. > 72.3% of all statistics are made up. And another 25% are misinterpreted. Poor Data Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Since Olympus refused to give us what we wanted somebody else will, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Confession, and a little confusion [was Panny 20mm/1.7 DOF], Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Remote Shutter Releases, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Remote Shutter Releases, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |