Struggling with the focus with the 25/0.95 on 4/3 and considering it
like a 50/1.2 on 35mm is most likely a viewfinder problem. My depth of
field calculator tells me that a 50mm f/1.9 on 35mm has identical depth
of field (within rounding error).
Skip the focusing judgement and take some real pictures. Both lenses
when focused at 1.5 meters will have equal depth of field of about 55mm
ahead of the focal point and 60mm behind it. (assuming conventional CoC
values).
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/22/2013 5:14 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> I keep running into this idea and I don't get it.
> Yes I'm sure that there's some nice mathematics to back it up but...
> I've use a lot of 50/1.8 lenses and I have used the CV 25/0.95.
> Believe me - the DOF on the 25 wide open on 4/3rds is VERY thin, far more so
> than a 50/1.8 on 35mm.
> I was reminded of struggling with an OM 50/1.2 on 35mm.
> So I won't be doing any adding or multiplying thanks, whatever the theory.
> f1.9 equivalent - ptui!
> I'll stick with the idea that the small sensor merely crops the image.
> The reduced focal length widens the DOF but the ultra wide aperture really
> reduces it a lot.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.soultheft.com
> Author/Publisher: The SLR Compendium - http://www.blurb.com/books/3732813
>
>
>
> On 23/01/2013, at 12:30 AM, Frank Wijsmuller wrote:
>
>> 25mm/0,95 on (m)4/3 is like 50mm ~1.9 (add 2 stops, or multiply by 2).
>> Thin, but not spectacular so (we did it all the time with our 50mm 1.8's ;-)
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|