I can't say that my 20/1.7 is sharper than my 28/2, but it sure is better
than my 35/2. A good lens and worth the money, despite the plasticky feel..
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Norton
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 9:28 AM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Confession, and a little confusion [was Panny 20mm/1.7
DOF]
> The 17/1.8 and 25/1.4 are both $500, the 20/1.7 is $150 cheaper. It's also
> appreciably smaller and lighter than the other two, apparently with
> minimal price to pay in performance.
Thank you. You made me feel much better about spending LESS than that
on the 28/2.
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|