On 1/7/2013 4:05 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> Decent size.
>> Not too attractive to me, as it means yet another down sample size and
>> resharpening settings/masks.
> Well, individuals can change the size in their own galleries,
To quote Emily Litella, "Oh ... Never mind.".
>> So as yet not up to the LUG implementation. It seems it gets around the
>> template limits by opening a new
>> browser window for the full size image.
> ...
> I need specifics on this. If LUG's standard width is greater then the
> question is what happens to the thumbnails to the right.
No, they are also 900. Jim described it well:
On 1/6/2013 9:56 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
> Ken,
>
> The LUG defaults appear to be 900 x 720. I usually upload "landscapes" with
> a width of 1000 or 1200. I upload "portraits" with a height of 800 or 900.
>
> The LUG gallery displays small overlapping rectangles top & bottom when the
> uploaded image is larger than the default. You click on these to get the
> full sized image. [In a new browser window.] I don't see these in your
> arrangement. The default sized image is downsized and does lose a little
> sharpness. The full sized image
> is very sharp.
---------------------------------
> I believe
> that at this time we still need to support a viewing experience of
> 1024 width. Many of us have old, ancient steam-powered iPads.
The trend is to larger resolutions. :-)
Trendless Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|