Subject: | Re: [OM] Another gadget obsoleted. |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 3 Jan 2013 20:46:02 -0600 |
> Thanks for the link. But I think this may be the key to fast > performance of newer technologies: "Many receivers can use as many as > twelve channels simultaneously, allowing quicker fixes" I'm assuming that has been the case for at least 10 years now for most receivers. Cellphones are another story because they are designed to use aGPS so TTFF isn't dependent on downloading as much information from the satellites. I've seen where some cellphones have but one receiver. AGps -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-D gets prize, Jan Steinman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Lightroom image management, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Another gadget obsoleted., Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] New Years' photos?, Peter Klein |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |