Can I tell you all fetishists a little secret?
The picture-taking performance of a lens is totally unaffected by the color of
its exterior.
Cheers,
Nathan
Nathan Wajsman
Alicante, Spain
http://www.frozenlight.eu
http://www.greatpix.eu
PICTURE OF THE WEEK: http://www.fotocycle.dk/paws
Blog: http://nathansmusings.wordpress.com/
YNWA
On Dec 24, 2012, at 5:24 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
> While you all had some interesting suggestions addressing the
> unfortunate color issues of the new lens, I think I'll be OK with it.
> After all, this 28/2 won't be alone. There's a 24/2.8, 50/1.4, 50/1.4,
> 100/2 and 35-80/2.8 that also fail to have the correct color. Oh well.
> I'm man enough to admit that non-chrome lenses look pretty good too.
> Besides, the 200/4 and 300/4.5 have gobs of chrome to resolve any
> identity crisis.
>
> But the big issue was finally getting around to telling the CDFO that
> I bought an expensive lens... I think it went better than I expected.
>
> AG/Butt-Less Schnozz
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|