Subject: | Re: [OM] Sad day |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 23 Dec 2012 22:24:47 -0600 |
While you all had some interesting suggestions addressing the unfortunate color issues of the new lens, I think I'll be OK with it. After all, this 28/2 won't be alone. There's a 24/2.8, 50/1.4, 50/1.4, 100/2 and 35-80/2.8 that also fail to have the correct color. Oh well. I'm man enough to admit that non-chrome lenses look pretty good too. Besides, the 200/4 and 300/4.5 have gobs of chrome to resolve any identity crisis. But the big issue was finally getting around to telling the CDFO that I bought an expensive lens... I think it went better than I expected. AG/Butt-Less Schnozz -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Garden D'LIghts, Chris Trask |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Sad day, Nathan Wajsman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sad day, Jim Couch |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Sad day, Nathan Wajsman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |