Subject: | Re: [OM] [Way OT] And the science is hardly settled... |
---|---|
From: | Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:01:35 -0800 |
> therefore probably chums with the shrill and aggressive atheist Dawkins. I just don't find Dawkins "shrill and aggressive" . At least compared to the preachers in this country. I suppose that it is relative. He just states his ideas which seem to me to be an accurate assessment of religious belief. Enough about that. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] [Way OT] And the science is hardly settled..., Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] [Way OT] And the science is hardly settled..., Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] [Way OT] And the science is hardly settled..., Bob Whitmire |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Poor quality of MZD12-50 lens, Michael Wong |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |