I like your opinion, Bob! ;-)
Tina
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>
> I don't see anything blown badly enough to require any messing around
whatsoever. This is a location portrait/candid taken in an uncontrolled
environment but being subjected to the Laws of Photographic Perfection,
which in this case Do Not Apply.
>
> Humbly submitted,
>
> --Bob Whitmire
>
>
> On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:00 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
> > Oh, I definitely like the image and I certainly wouldn't suggest it be
> > muddied. It's just that I and the Unblown Moose are harsh critics of
> > pure white (at least where it doesn't belong which is pretty much
> > everywhere). Maybe you can fix it in ACR with the tone curve. You
> > might be able to fix it with the parametric range adjusters rather than
> > going whole hog to the (uh, oh!) point method.
> >
> > Chuck Norcutt
> >
> >
> > On 12/6/2012 7:38 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> >> I run into the problem that if I pull back the highlights I get
comments
> >> that the scan is muddy. Most of the comments on this one have been
very
> >> positive. I hate to start manipulating more when the vast majority of
the
> >> comments are positive. It's extremely frustrating.
> >
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com
--
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|