I don't see anything blown badly enough to require any messing around
whatsoever. This is a location portrait/candid taken in an uncontrolled
environment but being subjected to the Laws of Photographic Perfection, which
in this case Do Not Apply.
Humbly submitted,
--Bob Whitmire
On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:00 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Oh, I definitely like the image and I certainly wouldn't suggest it be
> muddied. It's just that I and the Unblown Moose are harsh critics of
> pure white (at least where it doesn't belong which is pretty much
> everywhere). Maybe you can fix it in ACR with the tone curve. You
> might be able to fix it with the parametric range adjusters rather than
> going whole hog to the (uh, oh!) point method.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 12/6/2012 7:38 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
>> I run into the problem that if I pull back the highlights I get comments
>> that the scan is muddy. Most of the comments on this one have been very
>> positive. I hate to start manipulating more when the vast majority of the
>> comments are positive. It's extremely frustrating.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|