Subject: | Re: [OM] Eos-M |
---|---|
From: | Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 5 Nov 2012 05:59:45 +0000 |
I have been looking at the X-E1, Mike, so thanks for that bit of information. But what is it about Fuji and their RAW files? I have the X10 and it seems that the details of the RAW files are available to only a few Fuji favourites. Chris On 5 Nov 2012, at 02:57, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote: > I was a set up to be smitten for 2nd smaller cam by the XE-1 despite > the drawbacks with the nice manual control dials and it is indeed nice > but the OMD just was less fussy focusing. That Xf 35/1.4 is clearly > very nice even just using it for 5 min in the store. The DXO engineer > in the next area said they have the cam in their lab despite denials in > their forum that they were > even thinking about developing a RAW converter. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Nathan's PAD 4/11/2012: Samsø, Nathan Wajsman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 4/11/2012: Samsø, Chris Barker |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Eos-M, usher99 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Eos-M, SwissPace |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |