That's very interesting, Donald. I remember trying early Sony SLRs at a Mac
show in London about 4 years ago: I thought them clumsily designed (in looks)
although there were loads of features. But it appears that the design has come
on apace.
Chris
On 24 Oct 2012, at 14:49, Donald <d1956m198d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But then I picked up a couple of Sony Alphas. Nice cameras. Good
> handling. Good weight. And the viewfinders knocked the OMD's into a
> cocked hat, even the A37, which I think has the same resolution VF? What
> are Sony doing with those? I like optical finders, but I don't really
> think I'd miss one if I had a Sony.
>
> I didn't have a lot of time, and wanted to handle as much as possible
> while I had the chance, so it's just a quick impression. Maybe the OMD
> could be adjusted to look as good as the Sony finders?
>
> I couldn't fault the Sonys on handling or viewfinder. Which I find
> exciting and also, oddly, sad. I normally don't buy Sony stuff because
> they re-invent every connection and make everything proprietorial. But I
> really leaned towards their cameras.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|