Subject: | Re: [OM] The devil is in the detail. Small correction on Olympus Four Thirds statement. | 43 Rumors |
---|---|
From: | Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:53:58 -0500 |
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012, at 09:30 AM, Ken Norton wrote: > In other words, they just walked back everything that Watanabe said about > the E-7. > > Remind me again why we give any credence to anything that is said by > anybody from that company? ... but accept the explanation thereof from a website called "4/3 rumors"? Joel W. -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Same, same, but different... -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] 24/2.8 Zook at work, Rick Beckrich |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] For Ken: finally an E1 upgrade, SwissPace |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] The devil is in the detail. Small correction on Olympus Four Thirds statement. | 43 Rumors, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] The devil is in the detail. Small correction on Olympus Four Thirds statement. | 43 Rumors, Piers Hemy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |