On Sat, Aug 4, 2012, at 09:32 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I'm afraid you're reading the lens test results backwards. The lens
> isn't as *good* at f/16 as at f/8 but rather the lens is as bad at f/8
> as it is at f/16. That, of course, does mean that you can use f/8, f/11
> and f/16 interchangeably in real world resolution limits. But
> understanding the why of the test results puts a different spin on
> things.
Chuck, you are extremely depressing on the subject of lenses. :^P
Joel W.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|