Subject: | Re: [OM] (OT) New B&W |
---|---|
From: | Bob Whitmire <bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 25 Jul 2012 11:08:50 -0400 |
I think I've got 'em to spare. It won't be huge. I don't have customers for huge. It's what's saving me from stupidly ordering an Epson 7900. --Bob On Jul 25, 2012, at 8:21 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: > I tend to be a pano guy for landscape and was a bit surprised that I > chose Moose's zap (and same aspect ratio) over the cropped image (with a > wider aspect ratio). But now that I've seen Boris's fix (an even wider > crop) I rather like that one. Also much easier to do if you've got the > pixels to spare for the requisite print size vertically. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 24/7/2012: amid the art, Bob Whitmire |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] (OT) New B&W, Bob Whitmire |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OT) New B&W, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OT) New B&W, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |