Yikes, I guess it's hard to assess. Sounds like QC is a problem.
Otherwise, I kind of blame the learning curve for some of the grumbling.
I'm trying to think what it would be like to go to a dedicated film
scanner from a flatbed with transparency adapter, instead of the other
way around, which is my experience. I still would prefer a dedicated
film scanner, though with Vuescan at the controls I have no complaints
about the Epson.
Joel W.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012, at 09:20 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> 6 reviews at B&H. 4 people think it's a piece of crap. 2 people say
> it's the cat's meow. Maybe the shills?
>
> <http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/762304-REG/Pacific_Image_PRIMEFILM_120_PrimeFilm_120_Multi_Format_Film.html>
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 7/17/2012 9:50 PM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> > http://www.scanace.com/product/pf_120.html
> >
> > Sure reminds me of my Polaroid SS2000 (AKA Microtek), which is also CCD.
> > Optical rez of 3200? My inconsequential Epson V600 gets 6400.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|