On 7/1/2012 12:01 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> Nice one , Moose.
Thanks, Chris.
I'm not entirely sure why I took those moon shots. It seems somewhat of a mug's
game to do so with modest equipment.
Quality is always limited by air movement, and there are endless better
versions available form NASA and such. I suppose
part of the reason was simply the endless mediocre shots posted all over the
web. A sort of challenge.
But really, they are repetitive and rather dull. I much prefer other ways of
"shooting the moon".
Illuminating interesting clouds.
<http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=IATMS&image=_MG_8686ia.jpg>
With trees and clouds.
<http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=IATMS&image=DSCF1583nix2.jpg>
The ring around the Moon, with planet.
<http://galleries.moosemystic.net/MooseFoto/index.php?gallery=IATMS&image=_MG_8687ia.jpg>
All taken within 32 hours; first and last 22 min to midnight and 2 hrs 40 min.
later.
Loony Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
