Let's see... at $1 per scan that's um... a big number. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
On 6/28/2012 8:12 PM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> Going totally against the, ah, grain here, I suppose my question
> would be this: Why spend a large portion of your life scanning
> 500,000 images from the past rather than heading out to shoot 500,000
> more?
>
> It's not as flip a question as it might at first seem. You have the
> slides. You have the negatives. Methods exist for preservation.
> Preserve and protect and move on. If it's that important, surely
> someone can find a grant to hire professional "scanners" to
> digitalize your work and let you get on with the very real business
> at hand, which is doing what you're best at: TAKING PICTURES!
>
> My humble contrarian opinion, worth _exactly_ what you paid for it.
> <g>
>
> --Bob
>
>
> On Jun 28, 2012, at 6:02 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
>
>> They are very subtle but definite changes for the better. So when
>> can you move to South Carolina and help me do this to 500,000
>> photos?
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|