Going totally against the, ah, grain here, I suppose my question would be this:
Why spend a large portion of your life scanning 500,000 images from the past
rather than heading out to shoot 500,000 more?
It's not as flip a question as it might at first seem. You have the slides. You
have the negatives. Methods exist for preservation. Preserve and protect and
move on. If it's that important, surely someone can find a grant to hire
professional "scanners" to digitalize your work and let you get on with the
very real business at hand, which is doing what you're best at: TAKING PICTURES!
My humble contrarian opinion, worth _exactly_ what you paid for it. <g>
--Bob
On Jun 28, 2012, at 6:02 PM, Tina Manley wrote:
> They are very subtle but definite changes for the better. So when can you
> move to South Carolina and help me do this to 500,000 photos?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|