Thanks, Chuck. To me, the first two, shot at f/8, just have too much
background intruding into the subject area. The third one was shot at
f/3.5, which puts the background where it should be, at least for me. But,
in the case of the third one, the lighting is flat.
I'm learning a little each day. And the autofocus is essential when
following butterflies.
Jim Nichols
Tullahoma, TN USA
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: Monarch
>I like the 3rd one best as well but I think you'll find that one big
> reason is that the first two are a bit overexposed and lacking in
> saturation and contrast. But I suspect all the requisite data is there
> on your raw files and can be reprocessed to look more like #3.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 6/26/2012 2:50 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
>> A visiting Monarch agreed to pose for a bit today.
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Monarch+71.jpg.html
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Monarch+80.jpg.html
>>
>> http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/OldNick/Monarch+93.jpg.html
>>
>> The last one is my favorite.
>>
>> E-1 with Zuiko Digital 14-54 Version 1, ISO 200, RAW
>>
>> Comments and critiques welcomed.
>>
>> Jim Nichols
>> Tullahoma, TN USA
>>
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
