If it looks like plastic there's something else wrong. But adding
grain? Ugh!
Chuck Norcutt
On 6/12/2012 9:30 AM, Tina Manley wrote:
> Hi, Moose -
>
> I'll have to admit that I like grain unless it is so coarse as to interfere
> with or dominate the photo. I like what you did with Alejandrina, though.
> Noise remover program?
> My main objection to most digital is that it is too plastic looking so I
> usually even add grain to digital - just a tiny bit!
>
> Tina
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Chuck Norcutt<
> chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> And I need to admit as well that I'm one of that small minority with
>> Moose who has a dislike for the vast majority of pictures showing
>> grain... whether film grain or digital noise. It's not at all part of
>> the real world. I've been used to low noise digital for too long already.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>>
>> On 6/12/2012 6:55 AM, philippe.amard wrote:
>>> The Wizzard strikes once more - Excellent job on both Sir.
>>>
>>> Amitiés
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>> Le 12 juin 12 à 12:11, Moose a écrit :
>>>
>>>> Oops, bad link.<
>> http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Manley/Alejandrina_Gomez_Dominguez_age_2.htm
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 6/11/2012 10:38 PM, Moose wrote:
>>>>> On 6/8/2012 8:25 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>>>>> Yes, you are THE Tina Manley. Somebody get Moose a comb before he
>>>>>> comes online. I don't think I can handle the thought
>>>>>> of him doing Moosifications to Tina's photos.
>>>>> Too late!
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi THE Tina. AG is one of the majority contingent that thinks grain
>>>>> (or noise, in a pinch) makes most images better. I'm
>>>>> part of a small minority (one? two?) who believe grain is just an
>>>>> unfortunate byproduct of imaging chemistry.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that if early photographic processes were grainless, nobody
>>>>> today would put up with it, seeing it as an effect
>>>>> to be used very seldom. That's not to say I dislike all grainy/
>>>>> noisy images, just most of them.
>>>>>
>>>>> All prelude to saying how much I like the image "Alejandrina Gomez
>>>>> Dominguez age 2" on the first page you pointed us to.
>>>>> Shot on film in 2001, in the dark, grain was a given. Still, I
>>>>> think it's even nicer without so much grain.
>>>>> <cid:part1.00090803.02010400@gmail.com>
>>>>> A much better job could be done with the original size, but I hope
>>>>> the idea is clear.
>>>>>
>>>>> Noiseless Moose
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
>>>> --
>>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|