Thanks. This is looking like a good motorcycle kit.
--Bob
On Jun 8, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> High end lenses? (Serious question)
>
> 12-35/2.8 X-Lens (equivalent to 24-70mm).
> 35-100/2.8 X-Lens (equivalent to 70-200mm).
> 25/1.4 Lens. (equivalent to 50mm).
>
> The new X-lenses are weather sealed. Hmm... Odd that the current
> flagship camera from Panasonic isn't, eh?
>
> They ain't building these things just to put on Olympus bodies, you know.
>
> :)
>
> If I dove back into wedding photography in a big way and wanted a
> full-fledged, but compact and lightweight kit, I could see myself with
> two bodies--one with the 12-35 and the other with the 35-100.
>
> You know, it really is a shame that Sony/Minolta didn't continue the
> A-x line. That GT lens (28-200 equivalent) remains as one of the best
> lenses ever made in the digital era. I've shot a few weddings with the
> A1 and always felt that I took a huge step backwards when I went
> Four-Thirds in this regard. Even my old Olympus IS-3 with the 35-180
> zoom was pretty amazing for event work. (except for the aperture
> limitations which forced flash usage).
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|