I agree with your interpretation. It makes much more sense. But it
doesn't forgive blown highlights when one has a very high dynamic range
camera and a histogram. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
On 6/6/2012 7:06 AM, Brian Swale wrote:
> Chuck wrote
>
>> A great photo but I don't understand this comment at all: "The extended
>> dynamic range of the Phase One reminds me of when I started using
>> transparency film." He implies that transparency film has extended
>> dynamic range. In fact, transparency film is inferior to negative film
>> for dynamic range.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Here's the complete text of what he wrote
> "The extended dynamic range of the Phase One reminds me of when I
> started using transparency film. It took me quite some time to be able to be
> able to accurately predict the behavior of this film and I am now going
> through this process again with the 13.5 stops Dynamic range available with
> the Phase One. Another of my Milford images. Cleddau River. Phase One.
> IQ 180. 28mm. Phase One lens."
>
> What he is saying that his ability to predict the range of the Phase 1 for any
> particular shot is not yet very good. It took him quite a while to get to be
> able
> to predict it for transparency film, and now he has to go through another
> learning process for the Phase 1.
>
> As I understand him..
>
> Whether or not that constitutes an apology for blown highlights I'm not sure.
>
> Brian Swale.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|