Re: [OM] Quick, before the storm hits...

[C.H.Ling]

I intentionally set the background closer so all of them won't look good but 
you can still see which is better. It will be easier to see the difference 
if you download the images and compare them size by size or switch to A/B 
view.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


>I can't decide.  The 50/1.4s are a little softer looking but I don't
> find any of them particularly pleasing to look at.  I think it's the
> repetitive pattern on the wall paper.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 6/3/2012 11:25 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>> My test was a rather simple one, only at one magnification and a fixed
>> object to background distance. In the test 50/3.5 was giving a more harsh
>> background when compared with 50/1.4.
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/b50mm.htm
>>
>> If my memory serve me well, I remember the 50/3.5's bokeh was not bad for
>> portrait (that was how I use the lens in film age). With 4/3 it was also
>> fine in many cases:
>>
>> 50/3.5 with E-1 (F5.6)
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/P5231022s.jpg
>>
>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/P5231031s.jpg
>>
>> C.H.Ling

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/