Got it.
Thanks.
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
> Except it the subject is large or close enough there is little or no
> background.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 6/2/2012 1:57 PM, Moose wrote:
> > On 5/31/2012 4:39 PM, Rick Beckrich wrote:
> >> Thanks all... I don't know if it was the distance or the aperture,,, I
> >> think I've had softer results
> >>
> >> in the past... I think.
> >
> > My limited experience is the closer the subject in focus and the farther
> the background, the worse it gets. Limited
> > experience because I was shooting film and stopped wasting it on shots I
> knew I wouldn't like.
> >
> > Macro Bokeh Moose
> >
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|