Subject: | Re: [OM] (OM) OT image stitching / panoramas |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:37:35 -0400 |
I'll have to try it sometime. Chuck Norcutt On 4/26/2012 12:18 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote: >> the image at far left should have been taken with a faster shutter speed but >> appears not to have been... otherwise why is there a brightness difference >> from side to side? > Chuck I don't have time to track down the SS's right now but I assume a > faster speed. When shooting for a future stitch I don't like to get the > sun in the shot for obvious reasons. (but sometimes I break that rule) > In that pan the sun is just out of the frame. Even a single shot near > the sun is going to have a strong gradient. The object is no or minimal > blown highlights. If I had shot the entire scene manually based on that > bright area the rest of the view would have been practically black. A > fixed aperture is necessary for DOF reasons. > > Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Pres. Obama at the Univ of Iowa -- on-topic gear, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Pres. Obama at the Univ of Iowa -- on-topic gear, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OM) OT image stitching / panoramas, Mike Lazzari |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] (OM) OT image stitching / panoramas, Mike Lazzari |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |