Then whatever you're printing with is probably handling the sharpening
on its own. I don't have any smart printing software unless it's built
into LR and I don't know it.
Chuck Norcutt
On 4/3/2012 7:29 AM, Bob Whitmire wrote:
> I usually work at my screen resolution, which is 2560x1440. That's
> with all the attendant palate and work-area clutter as well as the
> image. The actual image rendered by LR 4 is 10.5x15.5 inches, which I
> think is a very comfortable size to work with. I haven't noticed any
> problems when I then print larger or smaller. And the images are
> large enough that the necessity to occasionally look at the pixel
> level are less frequent.
>
> --Bob
>
>
> On Apr 2, 2012, at 12:00 PM, SwissPace wrote:
>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Previews, this may seem a stupid question but to see an image at
>> its best what size should the preview be, isn't it the preview that
>> you make the changes to so surely it must relate to the screen size
>> i.e if I have a 1920x1200 monitor then should I make the preview
>> 1800X1100 so that I see it at its best OR do you all adjust at full
>> resolution (I think I remember Candance mentioning viewing at full
>> screen) or in other words how the heck do previews work.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|