Well they had a single lens so they qualify as an SLR !
...Wayne
>
> > I got caned recently for describing the Fuji X-pro as a 'rangefinder'
> > but, to be honest, how else can you describe it?
>
> If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's either a duck or AFLAC.
I consider
> it a rangefinder camera with evolved technology.
>
>
> > I'm attempting to write a book on the evolutionary history of the SLR
> > - wait for it and then you'll really have something to beat me up about.
>
> Hiring the thugs now.
>
> Technically, the E-10 and E-20 were SLRs. They used "reflex"
> technology for the viewfinder. But were they really SLRs? They didn't take
> interchangeable lenses.
>
> AG
> --
> __________________________________________________________
> _______
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|