On 2/23/2012 6:05 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> ...
>
> I do believe, though, that with the same amount of image manipulation and
> control options as found in a digital workflow, a Cibachrome output would
> still be superior. That, however, would imply a tedhnology not generally
> available today. Therefore, it's a moot point.
Even more moot than any argument may suggest, as the paper is no longer
available.
> The real trumps the theoretical every time.
You'd think so, wouldn't you? Yet it often takes the passing of a generation of
scientists for that to become true.
Aether M. Moose
PS: Yes Virginia, there is an Ether after all, but we choose not to call it by
that name.
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|