Moose, I wonder if during 1980 you ever imagined those KM could be
digitized, and the resulting file shown / shared through something we
now take from granted, the internet. Me, I didn't.
I was happy when I managed to afford a large print from KM, or any
other positive film. Printing positive film here was not only
expensive, it was almost impossible.
The first time I could pay for one, the only photographer here in
Montevideo who was able to print a positive, did such so well that I
won a first prize in a photo contest organized by the Uruguayan
Medical Syndicate (a completely amateur contest, btw. )
<http://www.smu.org.uy/>. It was published in its Calendar, mixed with
poorly photographed paintings and sculptures. This contest continued
until 2007, now it's no longer sponsored due to many reasons. I won
the last two events, one from scanned Provia and the other with
scanned KM. I want to make it clear that I participated in those
events because they were done as a social activity inside my
profession.
Fernando.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:55 AM, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what to think about the comments about good scans or the
> difficulty of scanning Kodachrome. The only
> difficulty with scanning KM that I've encountered is the need to clean the
> slide carefully before and spot extensively
> after scanning. Cardboard mounts and that IR dust removal doesn't work on KM
> make getting a spot free scan a pain.
>
> I'm really glad all these years later that I used relatively little KM,
> compared to other 'chromes in the past.
>
> Moose
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|