Perfection is an expensive luxury in my book, Chris. I would be happy
with just plain 'correct', so just call it a tank engine!
Interesting observations on pistons, valve-gear etc.
Piers
On 16/02/2012, Chris Trask <christrask@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> That's no saddle tank!
>>
>
> Okay, if you want to be perfectly correct it's a side-tank engine.
>
> Chris
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|