I don't think Khen was any part of development either. But if he was
then he should have listened very, very carefully to any negative
comments and probed deeper on those responses. A product designer
stomping off when his design isn't accepted is not exactly what Olympus
needs. But the day following the announcement is a bit too late to inquire.
Chuck Norcutt
On 2/9/2012 4:06 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> I don't understand him, Brian. Khen seems to have had a sudden rush of blood
> to the brain; I might have missed a previous post, but the first time we hear
> from him for a good while and he is complaining about the attitude of some on
> the List.
>
> I don't think that Khen is personally involved with development of Olympus
> equipment.
>
> The E-M5 is a µ43 camera; they have been able to accept both 43 and Zuiko
> lenses since their inception.
>
> Chris
> On 9 Feb 2012, at 08:33, Brian Swale wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Sad.
>>
>> I can understand what Khen is saying. I've been out of contact with the web
>> for a few hours, but early this evening caught up with a few items.
>>
>> It is very clear that Olympus have put a HUGE effort into this camera, and
>> no doubt Khen has been an important part of this. I think that his heart-felt
>> response indicates the degree of effort, hope, and enthusiasm he has put
>> into this very large development.
>>
>> I did a bit of hacking of an OZ commercial that came my way via my
>> favourite camera store and FB. There are 12 other video links at the end of
>> the youtube link here; I just watched the Henry's dot com video and it told
>> me a bit more. No doubt the other 11 will each have another aspect to
>> emphasise.
>>
>> To my surprise this camera will be able to accept both 4/3 lenses as well as
>> OM Zuiko lenses.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|