I'll read it with interest, Ken :-)
I can't see that that many pixels is practical for most people, amateur or
professional, because of the size of the RAW files. I suppose the journo in
the field could use jpgs (perhaps they do), but then why bother with the
facility for RAW capture?
I await your article; that sensor looks bigger than 43, to me.
Chris
On 7 Feb 2012, at 13:54, Ken Norton wrote:
>> You guys are sometimes just sad. The pessimism here is thick. Don't reply
>> and justify it. I'm out of here.
>
> I have an article for www.zone-10.com due tomorrow which coincides with the
> official announcement that just might suprise you. Whether I personally buy
> one will be a question I cannot answer right now, but this does mark a
> turning point for Olympus which is make or break.
>
> Shame that Olympus just got trumped by Nikon with the announcement of the
> 36mp D800.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|