Or the male tackle ("testes") :-)
Chris
On 6 Feb 2012, at 18:02, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I have no qualms with that. It's just that it should be made clear that
> this is a system test of lens, camera and user (sans tripod), not a lens
> test. :-)
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 2/6/2012 10:50 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> Future testes will be done with a tripod and a camera with live-view.
>> We'll eliminate the variables. Especially the AG variable. I was
>> pretty well caffeinated and sugared up at that point. But that's how I
>> always am, so it was a real-life shooting situation for me.
>>
>> Of course, we still run the risk of criticism because I didn't take
>> into account lunar phase, sunspots and so forth. It's like when Gary
>> did all his lens tests. The criticisms of his methods were never
>> ending. That may be so, but they are the only such tests out there and
>> www.zone-10.com gets about 200 unique visitors every day referencing
>> them. Not too different than my OM-3Ti review. It's not the best
>> review around, but it's about the only OM-3Ti review around.
>>
>> My goal after all this is over, is to have a reference test that
>> adequately shows the average person what to expect from some of these
>> lenses.
>>
>> AG
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|