No argument from me on that point. It's just that whatever you perceive
at such a small size is not lens sharpness.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/30/2012 10:23 PM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> I don't see why not. If you keep your processes the same for each
> image, the resulting difference should be meaningful if it can be
> perceived.
>
> However, if the tables were turned, I doubt I would accept somebody
> else's conclusion based on web images. It's just too much to ask.
>
> Joel W.
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012, at 08:22 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> I think your images are much too small (at least those we see) to
>> discuss which lens is sharpest. You've taken 10MP down to 0.5MP...
>> essentially thrown away 95% of the information content of the original.
>>
>> I think they're mighty fine web images and maybe they can be used to
>> judge color and contrast but not image detail.
>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|