I don't see why not. If you keep your processes the same for each
image, the resulting difference should be meaningful if it can be
perceived.
However, if the tables were turned, I doubt I would accept somebody
else's conclusion based on web images. It's just too much to ask.
Joel W.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012, at 08:22 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I think your images are much too small (at least those we see) to
> discuss which lens is sharpest. You've taken 10MP down to 0.5MP...
> essentially thrown away 95% of the information content of the original.
>
> I think they're mighty fine web images and maybe they can be used to
> judge color and contrast but not image detail.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|