Perhaps Sagelight's unique color as well as loss of detail actually
comes from mishandling of the 4-color pixel. If the fourth pixel were
simply left out I think that could explain both effects.
Chuck Norcutt
On 1/27/2012 10:13 PM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012, at 06:04 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
>> Joel are you saying that using Sagelight the resulting tif or whatever
>> you output from the ORF isn't as good as from Aftershot? I'm finding the
>> preview screen of Sagelight isn't the best but the resulting tif's
>> aren't bad.
>
> Aftershot is not something I have used at all. Maybe it's the next
> batter up.
>
> Sagelight converting ORFs from raw does a wonderful with many images but
> ruins fine detail somehow.
>
> Studio raw conversion preserves detail perfectly -- clean, crisp, little
> to no noise. But I cannot match Sagelight's look for love or money.
>
> Joel W.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|