On Fri, Jan 27, 2012, at 06:04 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
> Joel are you saying that using Sagelight the resulting tif or whatever
> you output from the ORF isn't as good as from Aftershot? I'm finding the
> preview screen of Sagelight isn't the best but the resulting tif's
> aren't bad.
Aftershot is not something I have used at all. Maybe it's the next
batter up.
Sagelight converting ORFs from raw does a wonderful with many images but
ruins fine detail somehow.
Studio raw conversion preserves detail perfectly -- clean, crisp, little
to no noise. But I cannot match Sagelight's look for love or money.
Joel W.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users:
http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|