Yes, quite wrong. ACR can't match Studio color rendition, which I
interpret to be what Olympus designed the camera for. This is my
biggest beef with DeepPeeve when they review Olympus raw files. Can't
be bothered to load up Studio. I have Elements 8.0 and use it as a
fallback when I want to see how ACR does with an image (just about
never).
Joel W.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012, at 09:10 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Anything wrong with using ACR for ORF conversions? You can get ACR as
> part of PhotoShop Elements for under $80 if you look around. Since I'm
> no longer doing portraits and swapping heads, etc. I do the majority of
> my work these days in ACR.
>
> Cbuck Norcutt
>
> On 1/27/2012 7:53 AM, Joel Wilcox wrote:
> > Other than that, how'd you like Aftershot, Chuck?
> >
> > Has anyone compared an Aftershot raw conversion of an ORF at 100% with
> > one done in Studio?
> >
> > I still might buy Sagelight, as I think it is fine for Canaan raw
> > conversions, but I still have to convert ORFs with Studio. It's no
> > surprise that things like this work well for Canaan just because of
> > their penetration. One of my gripes with reviews of the E cameras is
> > that they usually use a third-party SW for raw conversion, and why
> > shouldn't they when it works just fine for C cameras? I keep forgetting
> > the fact, only to rediscover it when I "go to strangers."
> >
> > Joel W.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Access your email from home and the web
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|