On 1/26/2012 4:26 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
> Moose,
>
> As an additional bit of information, I took a roll of Kodak Gold 200 to this
> same lab a few weeks ago, and had no problems with the CD images from that
> roll.
Yeah, well, as I tried to say, the interaction of one sort of grain and one
scanner/settings, may be quite
disproportionately different in result from another.
Now that Ken has told us what's probably going on in the scanning process, I
can instead be surprised that it isn't worse.
Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|