Subject: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM-D and Historical Context |
---|---|
From: | Chris Trask <christrask@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:59:29 -0700 (GMT-07:00) |
> > > Let me say this again: What I want in a FF digital OM that > > takes all my legacy lenses. And, since most of my > > photography is done with WA lenses 28 and wider, that lets > > out the OM-D (or any other m4/3) and an adapter. > >http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2012/01/a-guess.html > > >I'm not holding my wide angle breath. > I see at least one person on that blog is hoping for a digital OM-1. He's got my vote. Chris -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 2: mostly Madrid, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 2: mostly Madrid, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM-D and Historical Context, Joel Wilcox |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Olympus OM-D and Historical Context, Mike Lazzari |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |