Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Olympus OM-D and Historical Context

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus OM-D and Historical Context
From: Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 06:14:27 -0600
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012, at 10:27 PM, Moose wrote:
> On 1/21/2012 7:33 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
> > And some chips interfere with protruding rear elements. Beware!
> 
> I only have the one chipped adapter, Big-IS EMF. I can't see where it
> could interfere. Were you thinking of any 
> particular lenses I might have, so I can test? I have quite a few Zuiko
> lenses from 18-400mm and other OM mount lenses.

Gandy says there are NO reports of problems with Zuikos.  I had a
thought or two, mounting the 90/2 on the adapter, as I remembered that
there is not enough clearance with the lens to use it on the 2X-A
converter, but I works fine, of course.  I don't know yet about
something like a Tamron adaptall-II mount but can't imagine why it
wouldn't work.

Joel W

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an
                          unladen european swallow

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz