Thanks everyone!
Great info.
Foxy
-----Original Message-----
From: Chuck Norcutt [mailto:chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, 19 December 2011 6:24 AM
To: Olympus Camera Discussion
Subject: Re: [OM] Scan sizes (was Old friends (was "Kodak's long fade..."))
I forgot to add that my argument about the limits of resolution actually on
the film still holds.
Chuck Norcutt
On 12/18/2011 2:22 PM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I'll have to accept your argument. I don't have anything that scans
> at
> 5400 dpi.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 12/18/2011 10:36 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> The reason for scanning at maximum scanner resolution has to do with
>> grain aliasiing. With the Konica-Minolta 5400, I'd scan at 5400,
>> apply a touch of noise-reduction and even a softening blur (AA
>> filter) and then downsize 50%. The resulting images will be much
>> smoother and more "bendable" than if you scan at the lower resolution to
begin with.
>>
>> AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|