The 5D is now about 5-1/2 years old and has far more exposures on its
clock (about 21,000) than likely the sum of all film exposures I ever
took since getting my first camera in 1963. I haven't been (very)
tempted to replace it and, since the shutter is supposedly good to
150,000 frames I've still got a long, long way to go. The 5D supplanted
but did not totally replace the Minolta A1. The Samsung WB650 has also
entered the scene as a pocket camera but it has only extended my photo
capabilities without replacing the other cameras. The only camera that
has been totally replaced was my very first digital; a little Nikon
Coolpix P&S that has been entirely forgettable.
But I haven't completely forsaken the OMs. Dean Hansen and I are
planning a Florida get together in February wherein he will show me how
to shoot jumping spiders and other miniature critters with polarized
flash units and other macro exotica. I'll be taking along (used to be
Moose's) OM-4 for some remedial film camera instruction. Dean wants me
to bring Dr. Flash along. Must be he's contemplating branching out to
weddings and Bar Mitzvahs. :-)
Chuck Norcutt
On 12/6/2011 5:35 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> Chuck, no need to think it's a failure. That's probably all a good
> thing, although, it would have been really cool to have seen some
> pictures of some holiday gathering with long since passed relatives
> which you could have provided prints to the family.
>
> Now, that you've gotten that out of the way, get it serviced and put
> that 5D into backup mode.
>
> Personally, I rather like the M-series, but can see why some people
> really like the pre-M bodies.
>
> Funny thing happened a few years ago. As I was drifting in a rapid
> direction towards my THIRD digital camera, an OM-4T arrived in the
> mail. Since that time, I kinda now have the same viewpoint of digital
> cameras as I do automobiles and cellphones. Every two years you'll be
> upgrading no matter what. Each one you purchase is just a stepping
> stone to the next one you purchase. Repeat.
>
> But the OM-4T brought this all to a screeeeeeeeching halt. Even now,
> as I contemplate my next digital camera, I think "do I really want to
> do this?" The answer is, no. I'm getting so much incredible pleasure
> out of using the "old stuff" that the only reason to acquire the new
> stuff is so I can do more WORK. Too much WORK makes AG a rather
> unhappy guy. There is absolutely no reason why any of us can't process
> and scan our own B&W film. Got a kitchen sink? You're in business.
> Film and chemistry is still pretty cheep.
>
> Don't have a scanner? Then get an old film duplication setup and use
> your digital camera to "digitize" the film.
>
> AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|