It's already a done deal for the 1080 display at $230. The 1200 and up
are not in my budget range ($400-600). Fortunately, if I really need
some height, the display will rotate into portrait orientation. My
current 17" Samsung is only displaying 1152x864 so I'll still gain a lot
of height (and width too).
Chuck Norcutt
On 11/28/2011 4:16 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
> Chuck, beware of the "widescreen" displays...unless all you do is watch
> widescreen movies. A 21" 1600x1200 display has more usable real estate
> than the common 23-24" displays which are typically 1920x1080. I'd look
> for 1200 vertical minimum. There are true 4:3 monitors out there still
> but in the north of $1k bracket. The HP 24" LP2475 has been on my short
> list for a while but this old Samsung just won't die.
> <http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824176104>
> I have heard that Some of the well regarded Dells use the same panel
>
> This one looks pretty good too but doesn't have the track record of the
> 2475.
>
> <http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824176174>
>
> Mike
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|