There are devices that will do it wirelessly (dedicated Rx and Tx units, both
with HDMI. No issues streaming 1080p/24 straight from a blu-ray player to HDTV.
Pretty decent range too.
On Nov 20, 2011, at 9:51 AM, Bill Pearce wrote:
> The Chief engineer at the radio station where I have a part time job now,
> and formerly asst. chief for a group of Fox stations, says this: You can't
> stream HDTV wirelessly. Won't work, across the street, house, or room. It
> must be a wired connection. buh-dee, buh-dee, buh-dee, that's all, folks.
> (cue music)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Norcutt
> Sent: Sunday, November 20, 2011 8:30 AM
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
> Subject: Re: [OM] Anybody want to sell me a few small (1 or 2GB) CF
>
> I don't know how to accurately calculate the data rate required to
> support a 60Hz HD TV since compression can make a dramatic difference.
> But 6-7MB second sounds woefully inadequate since I think an
> uncompressed image would require abut 354MB/sec. But I could be way,
> way off the mark. Can one do Wi-Fi streaming off cable signals today?
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 11/20/2011 1:23 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>> Depends on what you need to steam, my Linksys E3000 under 2.4GHz
>> wireless-N
>> can delivery 6-7MB per second in a short range. It is about the average
>> you
>> will get with a medium cost router.
>>
>> C.H.Ling
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chuck Norcutt"<chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>>> My original thought was to buy a 32" TV to hang on the wall that would
>>> be dedicated to displaying still images. My wife put the kabosh on that
>>> idea. She thought it would be tacky. I think the TV would cost less
>>> then two very large wall prints with custom frames and mattes.
>>>
>>> I have a very nice 20x30" Florida wildlife print by painter Ben
>>> Essenburg that hangs over the mantle. This one in fact
>>> <http://www.benwessenburg.com/Balancing%20Act_largeprint.php>
>>> I paid the artist less than $100 for the print but it cost me $250 more
>>> to frame it.
>>>
>>> Are home wireless frequencies fast enough to keep up with the data rate
>>> of a monitor?
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/19/2011 4:08 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
>>>>> Interesting. It's the first time I've seen another 15" viewer except
>>>> The 15" seemed the best bang for the buck as you found as well I guess.
>>>> Sizes up to 20" and beyond are available. Some of dubious quality. Don't
>>>> know why they are so expensive when comparableTV's of much better
>>>> quality are cheaper. Avoid Aluratek. Anyone know of a wireless monitor?
>>>>
>>>> Mike
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|