My original thought was to buy a 32" TV to hang on the wall that would
be dedicated to displaying still images. My wife put the kabosh on that
idea. She thought it would be tacky. I think the TV would cost less
then two very large wall prints with custom frames and mattes.
I have a very nice 20x30" Florida wildlife print by painter Ben
Essenburg that hangs over the mantle. This one in fact
<http://www.benwessenburg.com/Balancing%20Act_largeprint.php>
I paid the artist less than $100 for the print but it cost me $250 more
to frame it.
Are home wireless frequencies fast enough to keep up with the data rate
of a monitor?
Chuck Norcutt
On 11/19/2011 4:08 PM, Mike Lazzari wrote:
>> Interesting. It's the first time I've seen another 15" viewer except
> The 15" seemed the best bang for the buck as you found as well I guess.
> Sizes up to 20" and beyond are available. Some of dubious quality. Don't
> know why they are so expensive when comparableTV's of much better
> quality are cheaper. Avoid Aluratek. Anyone know of a wireless monitor?
>
> Mike
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|